"We used a 14-item questionnaire that estimated a subject's propensity to rub their genitals with tree sap based on childhood infectious disease" Oh right then I guess I'll take your word for it shall I?
-
-
Show this thread
-
In practice, if I don't know at least a sample of the ~actual questions that you asked~, I cannot interpret the results of your paper in a meaningful way
Show this thread -
I respect your right to hide things for commercial reasons, but if you're not at least going to give me a sample of the questionnaire given I'm going to have to pass on putting any faith in your results
Show this thread -
I mean, in what other field would this be ok? Imagine "we generated a heart score based on clinical parameters pay $300 to find out what we used!"
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Who DOES that anyway?!
-
Somehow loads of studies even in high impact journals

- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
My biggest pet peeve
-
It drives me CRAZY. What's the point of publishing if we can't evaluate your work at the most basic level???
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
I have ALWAYS published the questionnaire as an Appendix. The ONLY reason one would not publish it is if one is copyrighting the questionnaire for commercial use. Then copyright first & then publish the validation study w/ a representative sample of Qs. Good promotion!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This wasn't the Ted yell we asked for, but its the Ted Yell we deserve.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.