But now comes the interesting part - what happens if I take out that single paper that appears to be driving the result? What do you reckon?
-
-
SMALL CORRECTION The forest plot I included earlier in the analysis of the random-effects model was from the log-transformed variables (oops) here's the plot once exponentiated:pic.twitter.com/Me4zJfoI6w
Show this thread -
Also, the p-value is 0.064 for this model, which is technically not significant. The effect size is also different from that reported in the abstract, however if I run a fixed effects model everything is exactly the same so I suspect that's what was actually done here
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thank you for this! I’m appalled at the misinterpretation of basic reports of late.
-
Pleasure! Honestly, this one doesn't appall me, because it is really complex. Other really simple stuff is much more frustrating
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.