For the epi nerds, when I run it with a fixed-effects model my results are the same as those reported in the paper, but my random-effects model CI crosses 0 
-
-
Who do we blame for the misreporting? I'll leave that to you There are many steps along the way that could've corrected this, but none were taken
Show this thread -
SMALL CORRECTION The forest plot I included earlier in the analysis of the random-effects model was from the log-transformed variables (oops) here's the plot once exponentiated:pic.twitter.com/Me4zJfoI6w
Show this thread -
Also, the p-value is 0.064 for this model, which is technically not significant. The effect size is also different from that reported in the abstract, however if I run a fixed effects model everything is exactly the same so I suspect that's what was actually done here
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.