That's not what I said, no.
Oh that's pretty simple - it's a strong observed association, but it's unlikely that we'd be able to entirely remove residual confounding so a number of studies still see the connection despite controls
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
I don't think either of those questions makes any sense. They neither did it by accident nor need training, and as I said it is a false dichotomy to present those as the two options
- Show replies
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
