-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Worth noting as well that the increased rates of autism are largely due to changes in diagnostic criteria, the 'true' prevalence of autism hasn't increased in ~20 years at leasthttps://medium.com/the-method/there-is-no-autism-epidemic-85974967d1de …
2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
We're literally talking about the label
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
It's not in the prevalence stats. And we aren't disagreeing, you are just incorrect
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Well, I can't look into the future, but as of today there has been no apparent increase in the rates of autism that can't be explained by a broadening of diagnostic criteria, similar to what we've recently seen with hypertension
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
Exactly- it didn't exist in the past! Someone who was diagnosed as Aspergers in the 90s, for example, would be autistic today. Can you see how that might make more people have 'autism'?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.