Official figures put the rate of prosecution from drug driving at random stops at about 8%, and while it's hard to be sure it seems about half of these were for cannabis So about 4% of the people being tested almost certainly had cannabis in their system
-
Show this thread
-
To work out how effective a test like this is, we use a 2x2 table like this:pic.twitter.com/CiCVlMVzmI
1 reply 1 retweet 3 likesShow this thread -
Now, we know how many people actually have/don't have the result that we are interested in, so we can fill out the right column straight away:pic.twitter.com/LbkcuVZoxM
1 reply 1 retweet 3 likesShow this thread -
Now, we don't know for sure what the rate of false negatives vs true positives is (sensitivity), but let's assume it's 97% - the number the police use That gives us this tablepic.twitter.com/DKPfKHFGGL
1 reply 1 retweet 2 likesShow this thread -
Now, going back to the original research, we think that 20% of all the tests that should be negative are in fact positive (80% specificity) Now our table is complete!pic.twitter.com/FUlWlkRSrU
1 reply 1 retweet 3 likesShow this thread -
Now, let's look at those figures Of all the negative tests, only 1/769 were wrong. That's 0.1%pic.twitter.com/dGcIE6rG6M
1 reply 1 retweet 4 likesShow this thread -
However, of the tests that came back positive, only 39 out of 231 actually had cannabis in their system! That's just 17% correctpic.twitter.com/6PctjVKpLs
1 reply 1 retweet 5 likesShow this thread -
What this means is that, if drug tests are wrong just 20% of the time, a positive value becomes almost meaningless
1 reply 1 retweet 6 likesShow this thread -
For law enforcement, that's probably a really big problem, because they (should) know that only 1 in 7 of their arrests for drug driving are likely to be a result of recent cannabis use
2 replies 1 retweet 11 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @GidMK
So my “roll of the dice” (1 in 6) was pretty close to your estimation of 1 in 7
And of course there are other issues about “use of cannabis” vs “impairment”. Either way, not good enough for prosecution!1 reply 1 retweet 4 likes
Oh absolutely, I have a friend who wrote get thesis on roadside drug testing and concluded it was basically a waste of time+money!
-
-
-
Replying to @DrBradMcKay
They aren't a fan, but no thesis on them. I reckon they're wildly ineffective
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.