Gotta love this silliness: "Machine learning overtakes humans in predicting death or heart attack" AUC with only clinical metrics (no imaging etc): .65 AUC with added imaging and machine learning: .82 Conclusion: ML is the savior of all mankind https://www.escardio.org/The-ESC/Press-Office/Press-releases/machine-learning-overtakes-humans-in-predicting-death-or-heart-attack …
-
-
- Overtakes humans but doesn’t compare to humans? - Better than existing models but doesn’t compare to them? - Only focusses on AUC and accuracy? - 85 variables in 24 patients with an event? I’ll stop here.
-
Thought you'd like it! I wasn't sure what they meant by 'accuracy', however. PPV?
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.