If a systematic review finds only small, poorly-done studies on a topic but they have mostly null results should it conclude #EpiTwitter
I think most of the examples I've seen are unimportant possibly bollocks. I don't think I've ever seen an SR on something killing children that hasn't included bigger studies because that shit attracts funding
-
-
The study that made me think of the question was whether wearable technology made children lose weight, ended with a call for more research despite: a) all included studies being negative b) this effect not happening in adults
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.