The reason I don't trust popular science books is because at least 50% of the time when I fact-check a claim it's either wrong or misleading
-
-
Go to the book chapter, and it cites a report that is unavailable on PubMed A bit of digging on Google and I find the report Claim is exactly where the reference says it is, except made without any basis
Show this thread -
So I read the whole report, turns out that the claim appears to be based on a single survey of a relatively small number of people in Lima that doesn't really support the statement in the book itself
Show this thread -
And then I look at the literature, and it turns out that the claim is disputed, might not be accurate, and is almost certainly more complex than the presentation of it as a fact in the book
Show this thread -
Bottom line: pop science books are great fun, interesting, can be very important, but relying on them for facts can be very dicey
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.