The article is titled "in India." The content of the article talks about where the supplements were made and sold. I'm NOT arguing that ANY supplement they make is safe. I am arguing that it is illogical to assume that products made/sold in the US are hazardous solely...1/2
-
-
on the basis that products made/sold elsewhere are hazardous. Is there evidence they use the same suppliers, techniques, machinery that processed identical other (non-H) products? We should be requiring 3rd party testing in the US anyway, but DSHEA is broken. 2/2
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @TrainWithBain @IKnowNutrition
Surely we'd want to err on the side of caution and assume that they manufacture the products in similar places? It doesn't make sense to me that we'd automatically assume that the US production chain prevents these issues when we know that it is flawed already
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @GidMK @IKnowNutrition
Why would I assume that products sold in India are manufactured in the same location as the ones sold in the US? I DID NOT ASSUME THE US PRODUCTION CHAIN PREVENTS ISSUES. I explicitly indicated it did not. Please do not invent arguments for me that I did not make.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @TrainWithBain @IKnowNutrition
I don't understand your argument then, apologies. My understanding was that you were arguing that, because this study was conducted in India, the problems weren't necessarily translatable to the US. I'm not sure I agree with that argument
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @GidMK @IKnowNutrition
Yes. That's flawed logic. (It's known as a "hasty generalization" but also qualifies as an appeal to probability.) That's my only argument.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @TrainWithBain @IKnowNutrition
I'd argue that there's not sufficient evidence to conclude that the products in the US are safe, given the known issues with product testing, and that the onus should be on HerbaLife to demonstrate safety based on these results from overseas
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @GidMK @IKnowNutrition
I made NO argument about whether any of these products are safe, anywhere in the world. I made NO argument about whether proof of safety should be required. Stop already. (The DSHEA doesn't require proof that they are to sell them in the US--I'd start by changing DSHEA...)
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @TrainWithBain @IKnowNutrition
You said that it is illogical to assume that the products sold in the US are hazardous based on evidence that products sold elsewhere are hazardous. I do not agree with that, as I've outlined above
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @GidMK @IKnowNutrition
You may disagree, but it is still not a logical conclusion. Your opinion about these products--and my opinion, which I haven't actually stated--is one thing, the rules of logic are another. Now can everyone please stop mansplaning and/or putting words in my mouth?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
It is entirely logical. Without evidence to the contrary, there is no reason to believe that the supply/production chain is not similar for different countries, especially considering the lack of efficacy in product testing globally
-
-
Replying to @GidMK @IKnowNutrition
You are now employing a new, as in distinct, logical fallacy to express your opinion, As a result, I give up. Go ahead, keep mansplaining and giving opinions. There’s no point in trying to discuss logic with someone who isn’t interested or doesn’t understand.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @TrainWithBain @IKnowNutrition
I am not, but to be honest veering called an illogical mansplainer for disagreeing with an opinion is tiresome and pointless anyway. Cheerio
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.