One thing I think a lot of people get confused by is what scientists mean when they say "new evidence could absolutely change my position" Often, people think this means one study, and get upset when they're told one study changes nothing
-
-
Homeopathy is a great case study in how not to do science. It tests an implausible hypothesis repeatedly until a desired anamolous result is achieved, which of course occurs due to chance The probability of the anamolous result occurring is enhanced by poorly designed trials.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.