And a follow-up question - guess which perspective was reported more?
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Title is correlation, conclusion is implied causation
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Surely this is a classic example of p-hacking? You collect data on enough variables, you’re going to find spurious associations.
-
Nah probably not p-hacking, they've used a fairly good statistical model. The main issue is that the title implies association but the conclusion infers causation
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.