As a very general rule, I've found that papers that get reported on in the media are better quality than your average study. But tbh, that's partly because the bar is pretty low for what is average
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Because studies that find negative results are published less and virtually never make the news (unless the null finding is VERY contentious), but positive findings are pretty much automatically newsworthy and so they'd be covered more even if the positive finding is wrong
End of conversation
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.