As a very general rule, I've found that papers that get reported on in the media are better quality than your average study. But tbh, that's partly because the bar is pretty low for what is average
-
-
Like, I regularly see ridiculous positivity from one study that's opposed by a large body of literature, or has little theoretical backing, but I rarely see a headline about a study that did their stats entirely wrong in every way
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.