I think it's more a case of type 1 errors than poor quality. They're more likely to be very positive, because that's what we want to read, but generally if it makes the news the actual components of the study aren't ~that~ bad
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
- Show replies
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.