To put it another way, our bigger sample is just as problematic as our smaller sample in key ways We've got more people, which makes the estimate more precise, but it doesn't make it more generalizable to the population
-
-
P.s. the REASON that egg eating is associated with good or bad health is, in my opinion, more complex than either of these studies suggests
Show this thread -
My personal argument is that it's ~almost certain~ that both of these studies are using egg eating as a marker for some sort of social influence that is really causing the heart disease
Show this thread -
So people in the US who eat more eggs are probably less well off in many ways, with the inverse being true in China
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Pish. You missed the obvious culprit: quantum eggs.
-
You're right we need new measuring equipment to quantify the effect of eggs that both do and do not exist
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
I really appreciated your thread! This tends to happen a lot in nutritional studies without taking into consideration the different settings and dietary culture.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.