They are more likely to be sick, are usually older, often richer than the general population Etc etc etc GETTING MORE RESULTS DOESN'T NECESSARILY REDUCE THE IMPACT OF THESE BIASES
-
-
TL:DR - two studies appear contradictory (eggs good or bad?) Realistically, it's likely just the differences between the settings for the studies Bottom line, bigger studies are not always better it's more complicated than that
Show this thread -
P.s. the REASON that egg eating is associated with good or bad health is, in my opinion, more complex than either of these studies suggests
Show this thread -
My personal argument is that it's ~almost certain~ that both of these studies are using egg eating as a marker for some sort of social influence that is really causing the heart disease
Show this thread -
So people in the US who eat more eggs are probably less well off in many ways, with the inverse being true in China
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
And both of these things also could have nothing to do with the eggs. (Ie neither are caused by the egg eating, the other factors can be the cause of eating eggs)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.