Response by critics to updated review of "whole practice" naturopathy evidence is interesting. Authors explicitly state they use same methods as gov review conducted 6yrs ago. Critics lauded rigour of gov review, but claim methods in this review are flawed https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-03-08/southern-cross-university-naturopathy-study/10879232 …
Sorry, I meant this criteria for inclusion. From memory, the 2013 review did not look specifically at "multi-modality"?pic.twitter.com/tPIkkRvHYk
-
-
Ah, that's just different wording. This was just a comment that research by naturopaths in naturopathic settings on single therapies (e.g. St John's Wort for depression). Both reviews had exclusion but worded it differently. One described positively and one described negatively
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.