Response by critics to updated review of "whole practice" naturopathy evidence is interesting. Authors explicitly state they use same methods as gov review conducted 6yrs ago. Critics lauded rigour of gov review, but claim methods in this review are flawed https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-03-08/southern-cross-university-naturopathy-study/10879232 …
Update yes, but they definitely had different inclusion criteria. Looks like the new one included any study looking at mixed naturopathy methods Also, I disagree with this classification, some of these included studies were clinical audits rather than cohort studiespic.twitter.com/fQDYgd7oJW
-
-
What do you mean by "mixed naturopathy methods"? Both reviews included studies only if the studies explicitly stated that they were delivered by naturopaths in a naturopathic setting
-
Sorry, I meant this criteria for inclusion. From memory, the 2013 review did not look specifically at "multi-modality"?pic.twitter.com/tPIkkRvHYk
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.