So, I'm just going to say it - yes, it's very hard in this situation to exclude reverse causality. There weren't any sensitivity analyses that really excluded it, so I think it's still pretty likely
-
-
You dismiss it, inter alia, by your conclusion poll offering only options contrary to the conclusions of the research. How do I dismiss it? I simply note, as a matter of fact, the study does not reach those conclusions in isolation & suggest "better safe than sorry" in that light
-
The conclusions of the research are also entirely consistent the recent WHO/IARC conclusions that hot drinks are a probable human carcinogen. Avoiding hot drinks seems particularly prudent in the light of those conclusions. https://www.iarc.fr/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/Monographs-QA_Vol116.pdf …pic.twitter.com/qyk5nNKZCh
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.