Is this likely? Well, the hot tea drinkers were also older, smoked more, used opium more often, less wealthy, and drank more at baselinepic.twitter.com/kZYIQGXxY4
-
Show this thread
-
Given these confounders, is it likely that there was some reverse causality here?
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likesShow this thread -
(Forgot to answer the question above btw, it was all of the above - the effect applies equally to groups, probably a minimal impact, and biases towards the null anyway)
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likesShow this thread -
So, I'm just going to say it - yes, it's very hard in this situation to exclude reverse causality. There weren't any sensitivity analyses that really excluded it, so I think it's still pretty likely
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likesShow this thread -
This raises the last massive issue - residual confounding Note how the authors describe their findings vs the Daily Mailpic.twitter.com/iCvBZCoW0N
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likesShow this thread -
"Substantially strengthen the association" is NOT THE SAME AT ALL as "see their risk of gullet cancer rise by 90 percent" (Also, lol, gullet cancer is a great name)
1 reply 0 retweets 11 likesShow this thread -
Why are the authors so cautious Maybe it's because TEA DRINKING IS SUPER SOCIAL AND HARD TO UNPICK FROM CONFOUNDERS It's in caps because GODDAM IT I SAY THIS EVERY WEEKpic.twitter.com/GUAQyTAYof
1 reply 0 retweets 12 likesShow this thread -
We can't exclude residual confounding. Maybe people drink tea differently in different social situations. Maybe hot tea is more often served with alcohol. Maybe a single measure of how hot people drink their tea isn't that great a predictor 10 years later when they get cancer
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likesShow this thread -
Maybe there are a million factors you can never measure, and never control for, and thus it's really hard to know if this is causal or not Maybe
1 reply 1 retweet 10 likesShow this thread -
So the authors are cautious. They know that there's a decent chance that the heat of your tea has nothing to do with risk of esophageal cancer But the newspaper needs a story And so we get "hot tea causes cancer"pic.twitter.com/g6kancVrKs
2 replies 3 retweets 9 likesShow this thread
So, let's recap: Large epi study showed 0.34% absolute increase in risk of cancer associated with drinking the hottest tea compared to cold tea, in large amounts, every day for 10 years Reverse causality and residual confounding remain an issue
-
-
Do we trust these results? Well, yes. The study was interesting, and well done Do we think hot tea = cancer?
8 replies 0 retweets 8 likesShow this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.