I think Gary Taubes took an L here. Great job @whsource
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vA3QavPp1Ho …
-
-
Joe’s face when Gary pulled out that anecdote about the boy who’s hungry before bed was priceless. Like a “really man? After nearly two hours of discussing studies you’re going to pull out a story?”
-
The entire argument was: SG: "evidence" GT: "story" SG: "that proves nothing *evidence*" GT: "...another story"
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
The thing that really gets me - Taubes represents himself as flawless and Guyenet as a theorist stating nonsense as fact, but totally ignores the flaws in his own research. If Taubes was right, his argument would be just so much waffle anyway!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.