And then you look at the studies used to back things like this up and it's a n=30 trial with no blinding or control that finds non-significant or very minor differences in one measure of strength
-
-
But the analysis variable is genetic testing. So actually what the researchers did was take their nice, randomized groups, and destroy them This is never mentioned in the study, but is a significant limitation
Show this thread -
Anyway, these are two of the BETTER genetic testing studies because at least they trialled some kind of intervention Mostly you just see a big predictive algorithm built on white guys and some fairy fluff
Show this thread -
It's amazing how much of genetic testing, outside of specific diseases and direct ancestry (parents, cousins etc) is just "hey look these genes correlate with that expression LET'S ASSUME CAUSATION THAT'S A GREAT IDEA"
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.