I didn't assume anything. Age is, however, an obvious confounder of autism diagnosis. Funnily enough, even the paper you've cited doesn't make the claim that you do, which is odd
That's what sci-hub is for. Google it Also, presumably this means that you're applying nonsense criticisms TO A PAPER YOU HAVE NOT EVEN READ which is, uh, an interesting way to try your hand at science
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Lol. As I said, you can do your own work. And if you didn't learn that applying objections raised 20 years ago about a different paper to a new study with a different design is total nonsense in your MPH, you should ask for your money back
End of conversation
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.