That's how confounding works and still not a criticism of this study. As I said, if you use time from administration of MMR as the initial time-point the objection raised in that piece makes no sense whatsoever
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Lol I'm not doing your work for you. You can't just apply weird 20-year old arguments OF ANOTHER STUDY to a new one, especially when you don't understand the objections in the first place. If you want the study, check sci-hub
End of conversation
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.