That's just incorrect. Even that reference merely says age ~may~ have introduced bias, but the design of this newer study - using MMR vaccination as time point 1 - eliminates that objection anyway
That's not correct either. Not that this is a particularly good criticism - adjusting for age should CORRECT, not exacerbate, this problem - but it's not even the argument that paper makespic.twitter.com/1mAqyWvdfh
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
That also does not make the claim you are making. You might want to read the paper more carefully. But as I said, the criticism doesn't even make much sense for the original paper and has no impact whatsoever on the newer one
End of conversation
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.