"#Glyphosate Isn’t Giving You Cancer - Why #RoundUp is probably fine for your health"
Below the slightly misleading title hides a quite good and balanced article by @GidMKhttp://bit.ly/2Xd6gHB
Not something I'm qualified to comment on, tbh. I'm mostly concerned over people making alarmist arguments that contradict the established evidence-base around human health
-
-
Here's an interesting read: the EU's scientific advisors' review on pesticide authorization. I certainly like it (most of it at least). But I've been involved in the process, so I might be biased... https://ec.europa.eu/research/sam/pdf/sam_ppp_report.pdf …
-
Sorry, I can't read every person's link to 75 pages! Can't you send me some bottom lines. I did look at the article but there's a lot of statements that are self evident, and frankly a little boring. LOL!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
How can you possibly justify shutting people up because they challenge the "established evidence-base". Science would still be stuck in the dark ages. There is NO scientific consensus on GMOs for one thing. For another, people don't want GMOs on their plate. That's a fact!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Here's a new report from the
@FAO that supports my concerns. More drastically than I'd have wished for. http://bit.ly/2SUUVgS -
why do we always wait for deterioration before we are proactive! It's frustrating and stupid.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.