"#Glyphosate Isn’t Giving You Cancer - Why #RoundUp is probably fine for your health"
Below the slightly misleading title hides a quite good and balanced article by @GidMKhttp://bit.ly/2Xd6gHB
This entire argument has been the very definition of an ad hominem attack. It's obviously tedious, so if you ever have an actual argument against any of my points other than "industry shill!" I'll be more than happy to address them Otherwise, toodeloo
-
-
Making fun of your appearance is ad hominem. Questioning your reliability based on behavior is not. But it’s easier to strawman it into some kind of ad hominem shill gambit instead of face legit criticism. I understand.
-
This is an orchestrated "ad hominem" attack against an international team of oncology researchers, toxicologists and qualified epidemiologists. Farmers are not safer as a result. We have to wait another 20 years until you, ACSH and Genetic Literacy Project stop your "mischiefpic.twitter.com/HGu746Cus8
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Do you consider all IARC experts were "alarmist"? Why were you not invited to join the epidemiologist listed here as Australia's representative on IARC? Do you consider Professor Lin Fritschi arguably Australia's leading epidemiologist is "alarmist"?pic.twitter.com/pTQLYWYc7Y
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Are you saying Dr Aaron Blair as IARC committee chair was "alarmist"?pic.twitter.com/kTVzCB2HuM
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Here is a clear outline of the IARC process. As you can see the team did consider major studies from Sweden and Canada not just the US? How was this process "alarmist"?pic.twitter.com/0nYXMN4p48
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Did you think it was acceptable that Dr Portier was the focus of a sustained industry attack when he did not vote? Why was his work for a non-industry, non profit advocacy group used by Monsanto PR to claim IARC report was "junk"?pic.twitter.com/idaQJ8BoMt
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
