No, he does not. Really. Read the text I linked to. @GidMK does not claim to "trump" IARC. He is just criticising IARCs approach, and he's certainly neither the first nor the only one doing so.
Definitely disagree there. Hairdressing, for example, is a category 1 carcinogen, confirmed to cause cancer. Not useful in the least for assessing risk to the individual
-
-
True. But definitely an incentive to improve occupational health conditions for hairdressers.
-
Or women crop farmers in the UK...If talking NHL.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.