I just published #Glyphosate Isn’t Giving You #Cancer - Why RoundUp is probably fine for your healthhttps://link.medium.com/kYqdFGH1kU
-
-
Look again., The bias of ascertainment in their sampling methodology, and the admitted bias of the PI are sufficient to negate their claims; not to mention their favorable citations of both Seralini and IARC. This is bogus and you do reason and reality no favors by waffling.
-
Wait what? (scrabbles though reference list) no its not the retracted rat study but an at least vaguely plausible tissue culture study, they also fail to cite microbiome studies that show no effect, but overall the main critisms should focus on the methodology
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
you want more robust cohorts? here you go https://academic.oup.com/jnci/article-abstract/110/5/509/4590280?redirectedFrom=fulltext … this too is relevant, though the headline stinks https://www.science20.com/news_staff/statisticians_link_glyphosate_to_greater_chance_of_nhl_cancer_in_metaanalysis-236640?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
