There are hundreds of stories every year on glyphosate and health This is because we love to fear scary chemicals, regardless of the evidencepic.twitter.com/RDWi9Zed0t
-
-
Show this thread
-
A recent systematic review and meta analysis found that glyphosate may increase the rate of a rare type of cancer by a bit Cue the media terror
Show this thread -
Realistically, the science is definitely not settled. The current best evidence suggests that glyphosate is almost certainly fine for your health in the quantities consumed by most people
Show this thread -
There may be outliers, who have very, VERY high exposures But for you and me? It's almost certainly safe
Show this thread -
Even the very high exposures are questionable If you want to know more, read the blog!
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
-
-
-
Your use of "probably" is problematic. The data that led you to use it are cherry picked and don't in fact support a claim even for high exposures. And there is still no plausible mechanism, and no credible claims.
-
Look, it's extremely unlikely and current best evidence strongly indicates that there are no harms. But it's also not possible to completely discount the probability given the state of the evidence, I'd use stronger language if there were more robust cohorts

- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.