Gathering and snooping around in data *before* a clear goal and research question are defined = inevitable poor science. Change my mind
I hear you, but a lot of the research I'm involved in came from routine audits or similar. Hard to predefine a question, sometimes
-
-
Sure. But would you call those routine audits high quality science?
-
Not necessarily, but some of the work that comes from them definitely is. It's hard to say where the line is tho!
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.