The problem with selecting RCTs that agree with you is that you can easily be misled simply due to statistical chance. That is why systematic reviews, and reviews of reviews, are so valuable
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
The thing is, we've got many such studies. As I said, over 170 of them. And by and large, they show that there's no difference between a magical homeopathic pill and one that hasn't been endowed with such magic
- Show replies
-
-
-
Oops. She's gone. At quantum speed, I guess. At least I found an entertaining read about Martin Chaplin and his attempts to prove nano/quantum/electric/whatever water memory: https://respectfulinsolence.com/2009/12/15/homeopathy-as-nanopharmacology-the-only/ …
-
Prof. Chaplin made the same point I was trying to make - modern equipment that is able to show nanoparticle/light/electromagnetic differences could make reliable studies and reliable products more possible. None of previous studies are necessarily reliable if remedies untested
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.