This is one trial with n=133. Not replicated. I remain unconvinced . @GidMK may have more comments.
-
-
Replying to @GasmaNZ @deNutrients and
The most comprehensive evidence to date - a systematic review of reviews, covering over 50 systematic reviews and 100s of RCTs - found that there is no evidence that homeopathy works for any condition https://nhmrc.gov.au/about-us/publications/evidence-effectiveness-homeopathy-treating-health-conditions …
1 reply 1 retweet 4 likes -
Individualized treatment is different from a group trial where the same treatment is used for all of the experimental group. Homeopathy is different from pharmaceuticals. The same type of experimental method for chemical pharmaceuticals is unlikely to work for homeopathy.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @deNutrients @GasmaNZ and
Many of these studies looked at "individualized homeopathy", it too fails overall to provide any significant benefit or effect
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
It also is unlikely to cause tardive dyskinesia or extrapyramidal symptoms. Homeopathy is not for resetting a broken leg but Arnica homeopathic remedy may help a little with pain, speed recovery of bruising. Homeopathy is more like adaptogen herbs, helping body perform better.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @deNutrients @GasmaNZ and
Homeopathy won't cause any issues, but it has no beneficial effects Exactly the same as doing nothing at all, except more costly
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
I gave links to quite a few double blind placebo controlled trials where significant benefit was found. In my personal use I have had some very significant effects and some no difference. In my experience with pharmaceuticals I've had some very negative effects & lasting damage.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @deNutrients @GasmaNZ and
The problem with selecting RCTs that agree with you is that you can easily be misled simply due to statistical chance. That is why systematic reviews, and reviews of reviews, are so valuable
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Going back to the original reason I replied to this Thread was a demand that a practicing homeopath pause in his work & spend time providing evidence. I've provided various evidence and it has been a complete waste of my time, except I've found out more about nanoparticles.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @deNutrients @GidMK and
Many pharmaceuticals are on the market with only slightly better than placebo effect evidence and a fair amount of harmful side effects. Why not discuss those?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Because we're talking about homeopathy. No number of ineffective drugs will make homeopathy work, sadly, in much the same way that a bad dentist doesn't prove the existence of the Tooth Fairy
-
-
Jennifer Depew, RD Retweeted Jennifer Depew, RD
and it seems no amount of evidence about homeopathy will matter to people whose minds are closed to new information.https://twitter.com/deNutrients/status/1070002815303643137 …
Jennifer Depew, RD added,
Jennifer Depew, RD @deNutrientsReplying to @Goldene_Regel @GasmaNZ @AlanFreestoneRead the article or stop wasting my and your time. Different remedies have different nanoparticles, different light and electromagnetic signatures - they are different from each other & different from water. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3570304/ …2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @deNutrients @GasmaNZ and
Oh, my mind is closed? If you'll check above, I base my opinion on over 150 separate studies that have been formally assessed in a scientific way Did you read the link I posted? And the 200-odd report?
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.