There's so much trash to unpack here I hardly know where to start, but let's kick it off with the totally bullshit sexist language used here and go from there This is obviously nonsensehttps://twitter.com/MailOnline/status/1070447233097785344 …
-
-
Also, while their results were statistically significant, when they used a (conservative) correction method, all the significance disappearedpic.twitter.com/txbeCBlBQE
Show this thread -
Essentially, this means that there's a decent chance that the results were nothing more than a statistical blip
Show this thread -
But ignoring all of that, here's a small selection of things that the study didn't look at: - cheating - female sex hormones in the womb - 'feminisation' of women - sleeping around
Show this thread -
-
The take-home from this study is that women with a bigger ratio between their index and ring finger lengths score slightly lower on a scale of relationship satisfaction THAT IS ALL
Show this thread -
If that sounds like basically nothing to you, congrats you did better than every journalist reporting on this study that I've seen so far
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.