What science are you referring to?
In what sense is it a "dodgy band-aid"? Excellent outcomes, demonstrated by robust clinical evidence - why does it matter how they did it?
-
-
Because it doesn't last (any more than surgery or drug induced glycemic control does) and it doesn't fix the underlying problem (over-consumption of sugar) - it is a delaying tactic (at best).
-
Why are you so keen for people to be sold a band-aid rather than simply being told what caused the problem (so they can stop doing it)? I know that will mean walking back 40 years of nutrition advice, but surely that's worth it?
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.