The biggest issue with media reporting on science is not comprehension It's not even reading the actual paper (although that's important too!) It's situating science in the context of other studies No research is done in a vacuum Very little of it is truly "groundbreaking"
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Not novelty per se, but the misunderstanding of science as built on novelty. There are new and exciting results, but they rarely change everything. I think there's space to translate preclinical research into interesting news without losing all the context
End of conversation
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.