In fact, scientifically, sex is a bimodal distribution that we have arbitrarily designated into 2 categories. This thread explainshttps://twitter.com/ScienceVet2/status/1035246030500061184 …
There are vastly more asexually-reproducing life forms than sexual ones. So again, you are talking rhetoric, not science
-
-
I don’t think that’s true at all. And for the sake of argument, let’s leave out single called organisms. Get into the vertebrates and sexual reproduction is the norm for the simple purpose of variation.
-
So your argument is "let's arbitrarily leave out most life-forms on earth - bacteria, numerous plant/invertebrate species - and argue about one specific group of organisms because that's convenient to my point"?
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.