I find arguments like this fascinating, because they are primarily emotive so you often see total nonsense mixed in with the factual assertionshttps://twitter.com/triplejHack/status/1063276134752645121 …
-
-
There's also often a lot of nonsense from people angry at the lockouts about how they aren't even working, when the evidence clearly demonstrates that they are
Show this thread -
Whether or not you support lockout laws to me seems mostly to depend on what you see as more important For doctors/police who are the main proponents of the laws, reducing deaths/injury is highest For young people, it's often more about having a vibrant nightlife
Show this thread -
Balancing these needs is tricky, and I'm not sure the lockouts do it in the best way possible That being said, you don't help an argument by ignoring data
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.