I keep seeing this critique. Defined hypotheses in this space are crucial. It's quite frustrating that we see claims that are so vague that they're not testable and enable goal post shifting as necessary.https://twitter.com/collinpopp/status/1063182514586640385 …
-
-
Possibly. Even in this BMJ iteration there was further refinement in noting the insulin:glucagon ratio (likely addressing insulinogenic AAs). Some versions of hypothesis r abt total WL, others abt where fat is sstored.Hypoth poorly states replacement nutr 4 CHO to keep isocal
-
More variations than one can tweet. I'm sure some could find a way to work ketone production being an important aspect in all of that as well. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.