Putting aside the fact that this is nonsense garnered from an n=10 study that didn't show this at all, can you imagine? "Sorry I was late, I had to get in my regular 4-hour daily bath. It's for my diabetes"https://twitter.com/MailOnline/status/1063183694452740097 …
-
-
As a statistical foible, I LOVE that the study appears to have calculated Cohen's d for baseline characteristics but not for post-intervention differences
Show this thread -
Oh wait, they calculated it but just didn't put it in the tables? Such an odd way to present data
Show this thread -
Oh, also the intervention seems to increase fasting insulin long-term, which is either a problematic finding or an indication that these results are all just regression to the meanpic.twitter.com/7oZEU0A7yv
Show this thread -
Final thought - love that they released the study ahead of press, but love EVEN MORE that the copy editor decided to leave the tables/figures out in the early release version and put these in insteadpic.twitter.com/K9MdPBSlWK
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
There's evidence that those 10 people are pretty clean I guess
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I disagree. It provides unambiguous evidence of the moronic idiocy of Daily Mail 'journalists', as well as the uselessness of their 'editorial' mechanisms
-
Look, I can't argue that. I always fear that the Daily Mail will block me because then I'll have no material for my next blog!
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.