Worth noting tho - "clinical trial" has a fairly specific meaning. It would not cover, for example, anonymized retrospective review of medical records
-
-
I signed a form to release my data so I could get treatment, they could have used weasel words to cover themselves. Whether it was "trial" or a "study" I don't know. I do know that I was put in the magnesium group for migraine treatment, others for a drug, another for botox. Cont
-
The drug was mysteriously found to be most efficacious. I was only told after it finished and my treatment was cut. I also don't appreciate being told that what I experienced couldn't possibly be true.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
It paper scientific paper with an abstract, introduction, methods discussion, conclusion, etc. Published in a medical journal is not an "anonymous retrospective review".
-
That's not necessarily true, but it does sound like you were enrolled in a clinical trial. Definition is here: https://nhmrc.gov.au/about-us/publications/australian-code-responsible-conduct-research-2007 …
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.