Perhaps next time you allow an organization to publish your writing and put your face on their website you should check them out to make sure they aren’t in fact an untrustworthy industry front group. Just a thought. https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2013/10/american-council-science-health-leaked-documents-fundraising/ …https://twitter.com/GidMK/status/1057398153433899013 …
-
-
Lol. I was just going to ask if ad hominem means something different in Australia, but I see we’ve cleared that up in the thread.
-
“You should have researched this industry front group before letting them put your name and article on their site.” “Ad hominem!” “Um...”
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
No, clearly you don’t! Does not being paid somehow make association with ACSH suddenly ethical??? Perhaps you can link to some peer-reviewed research on how that works. LOL
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.