Perhaps next time you allow an organization to publish your writing and put your face on their website you should check them out to make sure they aren’t in fact an untrustworthy industry front group. Just a thought. https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2013/10/american-council-science-health-leaked-documents-fundraising/ …https://twitter.com/GidMK/status/1057398153433899013 …
-
-
A poor attempt at deflection. I suggest you get reacquainted with the meaning of ad hominem. Scrutiny of behavior is wholly warranted here. Don’t expect people to see you as a reliable source if you can’t even do rudimentary research on who you are collaborating with. Simple.
-
I don't expect anybody to see me as a reliable source, that's why I link to peer-reviewed research to support my arguments rather than insinuating financial ties to industry in some sort of shady cabal
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Haha hang in there
@GidMK . These people can't tell the difference between magic and reality so don't expect them to discern between writing useful science and being a shill. -
Hurr durr dats rite, I’m jest a slack jawed yokel who don’t know nuthin’ *drools*pic.twitter.com/1r3tLv9gNI
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.