My new piece in the Guardian talking about That Organic Study and why it doesn't mean much/anything for your health https://amp.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/oct/26/dont-believe-the-hype-organic-food-doesnt-prevent-cancer?CMP=share_btn_tw&__twitter_impression=true …
-
-
To be fair, both of these studies have similar issues, which I discuss in the Guardian piece (i.e. questionnaires, observational, etc) making it impossible to infer causation either way
-
If you want to be fair then admit your error! Nobody is suggesting that this proves causation - but it certainly strengthens the case against the most commonly used pesticides in relation to NHL (which has been growing @ 2–4% per year and is now c 4.3% of all cancer cases)
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
That is simply a distraction - NHL risk is far more relevant, as I guess you probably know. You wrote Bradbury found "no reduction in risk whatsoever" - which is patently wrong and should be corrected if you wish to maintain your credibility.https://twitter.com/Alan_Watson_/status/1056649529796239361 …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.