Fun fact: "scientific" and "scientifically tested" are just as much quackery buzzwords as "homeopathic" or "natural" Things that have actually been demonstrated scientifically just make solid claims. Because they work
-
-
Replying to @GidMK
Same for “validated” questionnaires and prediction models. The fact validity was tested doesn’t mean it turned out “good”
1 reply 1 retweet 6 likes -
Replying to @MaartenvSmeden
"We validated that our questionnaire was a pointless waste of time" just doesn't read as well as "validated" though
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @GidMK
Have on paper I co-authored where we said something to that extent regarding a questionnaire. It got rejected couple of times, but now that it is published it was cited.... Oh, zero times. Bad marketing for your useless questionnaire someone told me
2 replies 1 retweet 1 like
People are idiots. Much better to publish the actual results than for people to keep trying at something that isn't working!
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.