*Observational data refutes hypothesis* "Observational data is crap! Useless! Epidemiology is BAD SCIENCE" *Observational data supports hypothesis* "Hypothesis is clearly true. Observational trials demonstrate it! SCIENCE"
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
And a book to keep flogging.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It doesn't have to be cognitive dissonance though in that I don't believe she experiences any mental discomfort from her regularly staggering hypocrisy and irony. Her job is to promote one viewpoint and she'll do that proudly and shamelessly any way she can,
-
It's just her fascinating ability to hold two entirely contradictory positions at the same time that I find interesting
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
I'd call it personal agenda vs. cognitive dissonance.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.