d=0.037, quick call the newspapers u have don a science
-
-
-
I repeated the same set of tests on a few extra variables for fun, and I can tell you that there are significant differences between these groups in terms of the year/week of data collection, record number, and number of people scoring 1 on my filter variable (p<0.00000000000001)
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
N...E...R.....D!!!!!! :)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
“Although one must worry if the incredibly smaller p-values from ever towering sample sizes are measuring meaningful effects”, cautioned the genetic epidemiologist who spends a large chunk of time finding ever shrinking effect estimates.

-
Look, I've got a p<0.00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001, that's almost definitely publishable
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
How many df?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.