That’s really sad.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
That is factually inaccurate
0 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
It is quite challenging to successfully sue pharmaceutical companies for issues caused by vaccines in all countries, because it is usually impossible to ~prove~ that the vaccine was the cause of any damage That being said, I do not believe it is impossible anywhere
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @GidMK @itsmePanda1
The US specifically set up vaccine courts partially because it's basically impossible to successfully sue pharma for vaccine damages. This provides people a much easier way to get reimbursement
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @GidMK @itsmePanda1
In Australia, many people are arguing for a similar system, because at the moment even people who have issues (i.e. anaphylaxis) that are uncontroversially linked to vaccinations cannot get anything without years in court and even then often are left penniless
1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @GidMK @itsmePanda1
In fact, the WHO describes it as an "ethical necessity" to have a vaccine injury compensation scheme because courts tend to be a terrible way to get compensation
0 replies 2 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
So why raise suing companies as an issue? Either way, we agree that it's a waste of time and a compensation scheme, however effective the implementation, is a better way to go!
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.