Skip to content
By using Twitter’s services you agree to our Cookies Use. We and our partners operate globally and use cookies, including for analytics, personalisation, and ads.
  • Home Home Home, current page.
  • About

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Language: English
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Català
    • Čeština
    • Dansk
    • Deutsch
    • English UK
    • Español
    • Filipino
    • Français
    • Hrvatski
    • Italiano
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Norsk
    • Polski
    • Português
    • Română
    • Slovenčina
    • Suomi
    • Svenska
    • Tiếng Việt
    • Türkçe
    • Ελληνικά
    • Български език
    • Русский
    • Српски
    • Українська мова
    • עִבְרִית
    • العربية
    • فارسی
    • मराठी
    • हिन्दी
    • বাংলা
    • ગુજરાતી
    • தமிழ்
    • ಕನ್ನಡ
    • ภาษาไทย
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 简体中文
    • 繁體中文
  • Have an account? Log in
    Have an account?
    · Forgot password?

    New to Twitter?
    Sign up
GidMK's profile
Health Nerd
Health Nerd
Health Nerd
Verified account
@GidMK

Tweets

Health NerdVerified account

@GidMK

Epidemiologist. Writer (Guardian, Observer etc). "Well known research trouble-maker". PhDing at @UoW Host of @senscipod Email gidmk.healthnerd@gmail.com he/him

Sydney, New South Wales
theguardian.com/profile/gideon…
Joined November 2015

Tweets

  • © 2021 Twitter
  • About
  • Help Center
  • Terms
  • Privacy policy
  • Cookies
  • Ads info
Dismiss
Previous
Next

Go to a person's profile

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @

Promote this Tweet

Block

  • Tweet with a location

    You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more

    Your lists

    Create a new list


    Under 100 characters, optional

    Privacy

    Copy link to Tweet

    Embed this Tweet

    Embed this Video

    Add this Tweet to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Add this video to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Hmm, there was a problem reaching the server.

    By embedding Twitter content in your website or app, you are agreeing to the Twitter Developer Agreement and Developer Policy.

    Preview

    Why you're seeing this ad

    Log in to Twitter

    · Forgot password?
    Don't have an account? Sign up »

    Sign up for Twitter

    Not on Twitter? Sign up, tune into the things you care about, and get updates as they happen.

    Sign up
    Have an account? Log in »

    Two-way (sending and receiving) short codes:

    Country Code For customers of
    United States 40404 (any)
    Canada 21212 (any)
    United Kingdom 86444 Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
    Brazil 40404 Nextel, TIM
    Haiti 40404 Digicel, Voila
    Ireland 51210 Vodafone, O2
    India 53000 Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
    Indonesia 89887 AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
    Italy 4880804 Wind
    3424486444 Vodafone
    » See SMS short codes for other countries

    Confirmation

     

    Welcome home!

    This timeline is where you’ll spend most of your time, getting instant updates about what matters to you.

    Tweets not working for you?

    Hover over the profile pic and click the Following button to unfollow any account.

    Say a lot with a little

    When you see a Tweet you love, tap the heart — it lets the person who wrote it know you shared the love.

    Spread the word

    The fastest way to share someone else’s Tweet with your followers is with a Retweet. Tap the icon to send it instantly.

    Join the conversation

    Add your thoughts about any Tweet with a Reply. Find a topic you’re passionate about, and jump right in.

    Learn the latest

    Get instant insight into what people are talking about now.

    Get more of what you love

    Follow more accounts to get instant updates about topics you care about.

    Find what's happening

    See the latest conversations about any topic instantly.

    Never miss a Moment

    Catch up instantly on the best stories happening as they unfold.

    1. Health Nerd‏Verified account @GidMK 3 Oct 2018

      I often find discussion about industry funding in research very frustrating Industry funding doesn't necessarily mean a study is bad: a thread

      4 replies 15 retweets 37 likes
      Show this thread
    2. Health Nerd‏Verified account @GidMK 3 Oct 2018

      The basic assumption is this: companies fund research to prove that their products work. This is fairly obvious. No money in showing that your product is useless!

      1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes
      Show this thread
    3. Health Nerd‏Verified account @GidMK 3 Oct 2018

      This leads to all sorts of potential conflicts of interest. @bengoldacre covers the various ways in which pharmaceutical companies can/do mislead in their research in his book Bad Pharma

      1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes
      Show this thread
      Health Nerd‏Verified account @GidMK 3 Oct 2018

      And we see this fairly easily. There is a lot of research demonstrating that industry-funded studies are more likely to give positive resultspic.twitter.com/4WqKHzWxgQ

      3:03 PM - 3 Oct 2018
      • 7 Likes
      • Hightower Clinical Andrew Althouse Alex Limkakeng (get vaxxed!) Kathryn Bradbury Michael Mindrum
      1 reply 0 retweets 7 likes
        1. New conversation
        2. Health Nerd‏Verified account @GidMK 3 Oct 2018

          BUT Here's where it gets tricky Numerous systematic reviews have also identified a key problem: industry-funded trials are just as good IF NOT BETTER than non-industry funded trialspic.twitter.com/dAENRM9xek

          3 replies 0 retweets 8 likes
          Show this thread
        3. Health Nerd‏Verified account @GidMK 3 Oct 2018

          This also makes sense: the industry has to use these studies to get drugs through regulatory authorities. Bad studies are less likely to lead to an approved drug!

          1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes
          Show this thread
        4. Health Nerd‏Verified account @GidMK 3 Oct 2018

          So what's happening here? The conclusion of the Cochrane review I pictured above gives you some idea... https://www.cochrane.org/MR000033/METHOD_industry-sponsorship-and-research-outcome …pic.twitter.com/NsVcfiv8JW

          1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes
          Show this thread
        5. Health Nerd‏Verified account @GidMK 3 Oct 2018

          The other systematic review I cited also paints a bit of a picturepic.twitter.com/Ee8ejUgQO8

          1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes
          Show this thread
        6. Health Nerd‏Verified account @GidMK 3 Oct 2018

          What do you think it is?

          3 replies 3 retweets 1 like
          Show this thread
        7. Health Nerd‏Verified account @GidMK 3 Oct 2018

          See, the thing is, if you look at each individual study under a microscope, it looks like the industry is doing everything right! Maybe some sneaky things here and there, but in general they do as well as or better than independent research

          2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes
          Show this thread
        8. Health Nerd‏Verified account @GidMK 3 Oct 2018

          The problem is largely meta-research issues like publication bias. This is why @senseaboutsci is pushing for publication of ALL research findings

          1 reply 1 retweet 8 likes
          Show this thread
        9. Health Nerd‏Verified account @GidMK 3 Oct 2018

          If you can control which studies get published, and perhaps more importantly which studies get SEEN (big journals, media attention etc), then you can control the narrative about which drugs are best

          1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes
          Show this thread
        10. Health Nerd‏Verified account @GidMK 3 Oct 2018

          (Yes, the answer was 2: publication bias in the poll above)

          1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes
          Show this thread
        11. Health Nerd‏Verified account @GidMK 3 Oct 2018

          If someone says "but this study was funded by industry! That means it's bad!" you can cite the Cochrane or other reviews demonstrating why they are probably wrong

          1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes
          Show this thread
        12. Health Nerd‏Verified account @GidMK 3 Oct 2018

          But when you read about a medical intervention, it's always worth having a look at the non-industry funded studies show, because they are less likely to suffer from publication bias

          1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes
          Show this thread
        13. Health Nerd‏Verified account @GidMK 3 Oct 2018

          And importantly, THIS DOESN'T JUST APPLY TO DRUGS If you compare industry-funded studies of ketogenic diets vs independent research, you see a similar trend

          1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
          Show this thread
        14. Health Nerd‏Verified account @GidMK 3 Oct 2018

          People who have a stake in the game are just less likely to publish research that might mean they will make less money. They also won't promote it, and may make it more difficult to access for everyone This is, in many ways, much worse than simply doing bad studies

          1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes
          Show this thread
        15. Health Nerd‏Verified account @GidMK 3 Oct 2018

          Bad studies are easy to find, easy to discard, easy to ignore. Most studies I've read on acupuncture, for example, are just awful Can't conclude anything from bad research!

          1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes
          Show this thread
        16. Health Nerd‏Verified account @GidMK 3 Oct 2018

          But by only publishing positive studies, and only promoting the very best ones, industries can manipulate the narrative by using basic statistical fact: Do enough studies and some of them will be VERY positive

          1 reply 1 retweet 8 likes
          Show this thread
        17. Health Nerd‏Verified account @GidMK 3 Oct 2018

          Some of them will be very negative too, but since you can control what gets published, people only see the good and never even hear about the bad

          1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
          Show this thread
        18. Health Nerd‏Verified account @GidMK 3 Oct 2018

          All of this to say: the industry can produce hundreds of amazingly well-done studies and STILL do things in a dodgy way, which is why you should support @senseaboutsci and pre-registration efforts everywhere!

          2 replies 1 retweet 4 likes
          Show this thread
        19. End of conversation

      Loading seems to be taking a while.

      Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

        Promoted Tweet

        false

        • © 2021 Twitter
        • About
        • Help Center
        • Terms
        • Privacy policy
        • Cookies
        • Ads info